<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>vombie.com &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vombie.com/category/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vombie.com</link>
	<description>Musings of a geeky gal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 01:33:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Meta Four</title>
		<link>http://vombie.com/2010/09/07/meta-four/</link>
		<comments>http://vombie.com/2010/09/07/meta-four/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vombie.com/?p=468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Saturday, I took the minions &#038; a friend to something called &#8216;Abbey Road on the River;&#8217; an all-weekend music fest devoted to The Beatles. This is something that they apparently do annually in Kentucky (!), but it was the first time they&#8217;d taken it &#8216;on the road&#8217; to D.C. I have to confess to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Saturday, I took the minions &#038; a friend to something called &#8216;Abbey Road on the River;&#8217; an all-weekend music fest devoted to The Beatles. This is something that they apparently do annually in Kentucky (!), but it was the first time they&#8217;d taken it &#8216;on the road&#8217; to D.C. I have to confess to being pulled in by a curiosity to see how&#8230; <em>meta</em> it would be. I mean, this event was four days of five+ stages of bands doing (almost) nothing but covers of songs from a band that broke up 40 years ago. I opted to only go for one day, though; how many times can one listen to variations of &#8216;Paperback Writer?&#8217;</p>
<p>Pete Best was there.<br />
Harley-Davidson was there.</p>
<p>The crowd was mixed in age, gender, and socio-economic appearance, but not terribly diverse in terms of race. In terms of audience, it reminded me a bit of when I saw the Grateful Dead in the late &#8217;80s; older people recapturing their youth and perhaps feeling more relevant as a result, younger people romanticizing a time in the past they never experienced (one could say this is similar to Civil War re-enactments and Renaissance festivals, since it is). </p>
<p>The bands themselves were actually quite enjoyable. Some dressed as specific-era Beatles, some were from foreign countries, and most all of them used &#8216;authentic&#8217; instruments. At first I thought it was kind of odd imagining having a career that revolved around performing the music of a singular (defunct) band, but upon reflection, how is it really any different than performing the works of, say, Beethoven or Mozart or even Shakespeare? I actually imagine that variants of this event could be intriguing and successful&#8211;a Woodstock re-enactment, or maybe a Jacksons-inspired festival. I know a few people who&#8217;d pay good money for an all-day Madonnafest. </p>
<p>Music festivals are always in themselves slight curiosities (and therefore delicious for someone who loves to observe things); with a few notable exceptions, the crowds exist within the spirit of the music. Events like Lollapalooza and Ozzfest tend to bring out the ugly side of this; aggressive music seems to give some participants a sense of entitlement to act without regard for others. I can&#8217;t even count how many times I&#8217;ve been bumped into at an event like that where the person that hit me gave me a look that said &#8216;I dare you to escalate; I want drama and confrontation in my life and need a target to take my frustrations out on.&#8217; But a Beatles festival? There might as well have been rainbows and unicorns prancing about for all of the happy-fun-time atmosphere there&#8211;and not even in a druggie kind of way. The minor incident that I saw (where someone tried to slip past security into the Reserved area) was even surreal, comedic gold. An attendant approached the offender, smiled; the offender smiled back but refused to leave. The attendant nodded and politely went back to his post, then took the two police officers that showed up over to the offender. He didn&#8217;t put up a fight or cop (heh) an attitude, he just politely walked out with the LEOs; no issues, no confrontation. It was a most &#8216;civil disobedience.&#8217;</p>
<p>I suppose if you really try hard, you could be miserable at an event like this, but why force curmudgeonry? You&#8217;re surrounded by beautiful scenery; lush gardens, the waterfront, and dragonflies galore on a perfect late summer&#8217;s day. The people are pleasant and respectful, the beer is good and not horrifically overpriced, the bathrooms are of the indoor-flushing variety&#8230; and, fan or not, the music is downright fun. Plus, if you head over to the other side of the National Harbor, there&#8217;s a Peeps store! And how can you not smile and appreciate the meta-ness when there are guys onstage dressed in &#8216;Sgt. Pepper&#8217; finery promoting their facebook and Twitter accounts, the &#8216;Norwegian Beatles&#8217; flailing about with botched English, and a Sullivan-era crew of faux-mop tops from Puerto Rico hawking their CDs and Web site? The evening capped off with a fireworks display over the water, which didn&#8217;t quite sync up with the rendition of &#8216;Live and Let Die&#8217; that was playing (not that it was supposed to), but it certainly was a fitting and perfect ending to a fab(four)ulous day.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-468"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vombie.com/2010/09/07/meta-four/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Top 10 Sci-Fi Bands</title>
		<link>http://vombie.com/2010/05/26/the-top-10-sci-fi-bands/</link>
		<comments>http://vombie.com/2010/05/26/the-top-10-sci-fi-bands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 19:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vombie.com/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thought I&#8217;d take a little break from the self-focused opines and blatherings to do something a little more fun. So on that note, I present my selections for the top ten sci-fi bands. Feel free to add your own or share your list! 10. Daft Punk &#8211; While their music isn&#8217;t all specifically sci-fi, their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought I&#8217;d take a little break from the self-focused opines and blatherings to do something a little more fun. So on that note, I present my selections for the top ten sci-fi bands. Feel free to add your own or share your list!</p>
<p><a href="http://vombie.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/3FkmC.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-433" title="Oooh_space" src="http://vombie.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/3FkmC-300x187.jpg" alt="space" width="500" height="287" /></a></p>
<p>10. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fentity%2FDaft-Punk%2FB000APYLFU%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dsr%5Ftc%5F2%5F0%26qid%3D1274839844%26sr%3D8-2-ent&amp;tag=perthkoala-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957">Daft Punk</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=perthkoala-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> &#8211; While their music isn&#8217;t all specifically sci-fi, their electronic sound certainly gets lumped into the &#8216;futuristic&#8217; category. They&#8217;re well known for their high-tech visuals and costumes as well as for having interesting videos. They co-produced the animated film The 5tory of the 5ecret 5tar 5ystem, and (building on their machines-to-men theme) released a film called Electroma, the story of two robots trying to discover their humanity.</p>
<p>9. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fentity%2FDevo%2FB000AQ061M%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dsr%5Ftc%5F2%5F0%26qid%3D1274840312%26sr%3D1-2-ent&amp;tag=perthkoala-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957">Devo</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=perthkoala-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> &#8211; While perhaps best known for their geometric hats, sci-fi imagery, and the song <em>Whip It</em>, they were quite successful in the alternative/underground scene in the 80s, and <em>Jocko Homo</em>, <em>Freedom of Choice</em>, <em>Girl U Want</em>, as well as their covers (<em>Satisfaction</em>, <em>Working in the Coalmine</em>), were the musical soundscape to many sci-fi movies and shows. Nowadays, their music appears in several TV commercials.</p>
<p>8. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fentity%2FOrbital%2FB000APWUVW%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dsr%5Ftc%5F2%5F0%26qid%3D1274840807%26sr%3D1-2-ent&amp;tag=perthkoala-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957">Orbital</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=perthkoala-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> While their music has been used in several sci-fi movies (<em>The Saint</em>, <em>Event Horizon</em>, <em>Hackers</em>, <em>Mortal Combat</em>, <em>Johnny Mnemonic</em>), they had to make the list via their <em>Doctor Who</em> theme song. In a way, it&#8217;d be pretty easy to make the entire list electronica bands, so I limited how many would be in the top.</p>
<p>7. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fentity%2FVoivod%2FB000APZ3J8%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dsr%5Ftc%5F2%5F0%26qid%3D1274841036%26sr%3D1-2-ent&amp;tag=perthkoala-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957">Voivod</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=perthkoala-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> &#8211; while there could be a strictly metal version of this list, this is the band that takes the top of the metal category. They&#8217;re based on the concept of the Voivod, a futuristic warrior/overlord.</p>
<p>6. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fentity%2FStyx%2FB000APXDV8%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dsr%5Ftc%5F2%5F0%26qid%3D1274841531%26sr%3D1-2-ent&amp;tag=perthkoala-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957">Styx</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=perthkoala-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> &#8211; While heavily parodied, the theatrics of their <em>Kilroy was Here</em> concept album (which told the story of a future where rock &amp; roll was outlawed), featuring <em>Mr. Roboto</em>, were considered a musical sci-fi staple at one point. I have a backup NAS unit called a Drobo, which I named &#8216;DroboArigato&#8217; after the line in <em>Mr. Roboto</em>.</p>
<p>5. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fentity%2FQueen%2FB000AQ0748%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dsr%5Ftc%5F2%5F0%26qid%3D1274841707%26sr%3D1-2-ent&amp;tag=perthkoala-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957">Queen</a><img src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=perthkoala-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> &#8211; Queen&#8217;s main sci-fi musical work was the <em>Flash Gordon </em>soundtrack, and to a lesser extent the <em>Highlander</em> soundtrack (which is more fantasy). But the band themselves had a very sci-fi presence to them &#8211; theatrical, otherwordly, and somewhat dystopian. [Of course, who could omit the memorable scene in the horror/zombie/comedy movie <em>Shaun of the Dead</em> featuring <em>Don't Stop Me Now</em>, albeit a stretch to include zombies as sci-fi...] To this day I can&#8217;t hear the world &#8216;Flash&#8217; without adding &#8216;aah-aah&#8217; to it.</p>
<p>4. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fentity%2FPink-Floyd%2FB000APVN38%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dsr%5Ftc%5F2%5F0%26qid%3D1274841597%26sr%3D1-2-ent&amp;tag=perthkoala-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957">Pink Floyd</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=perthkoala-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> &#8211; While it&#8217;s fair to consider Pink Floyd a psychedelic band, <em>Dark Side of the Moon</em> is also a great sci-fi musical journey, and <em>The Wall</em> could certainly be considered an excellent example of a dystopian future, with its exaggerated themes of fear, insecurity, and loss (and how we end up trying to hide and protect ourselves from our fears). Pink Floyd also transcended their musical expression to their visual presentations, and were well known for their elaborate stages and lighting. [When I saw them live, a giant object was emerging from the center of the stadium; a friend next to me leaned over and asked me what it was, like somehow I'd know. I sarcastically blurted out, 'a giant disco ball.' It was a giant disco ball.]</p>
<p>3. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fentity%2FTubeway-Army%2FB000APV1ZS%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dsr%5Ftc%5F2%5F0%26qid%3D1274841637%26sr%3D1-2-ent&amp;tag=perthkoala-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957">Tubeway Army/Gary Numan</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=perthkoala-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> &#8211; I&#8217;m cheating a little to include Gary Numan in here, but Tubeway Army&#8217;s sci-fi elements would be mostly his brainchild. They made one of the best sci-fi songs ever (<em>Down in the Park</em>), as well as songs like <em>Are &#8216;Friends&#8217; Electric?</em>, and their song <em>Listen to the Sirens</em> quoted from Philip K. Dick.</p>
<p>2. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fentity%2FMuse%2FB000AP5PXW%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dsr%5Ftc%5F2%5F0%26qid%3D1274841760%26sr%3D1-2-ent&amp;tag=perthkoala-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957">Muse</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=perthkoala-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> &#8211; these days it seems you can&#8217;t have a sci-fi show without it featuring some sort of Muse song in the ads. Unfortunately, this also has put their music onto a certain popular teen vampire franchise as well. Their <em>Black Holes and Revelations</em> album covered the sci-fi gamut from NWO to alien invasions. And let&#8217;s face it, not that many people can get away with making <em>Supermassive Black Holes</em> sexy (the actual ones, not just something that could be used as a porn name).</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fentity%2FE.L.O.%2FB000APBB9O%3Fie%3DUTF8%26ref_%3Dsr%5Ftc%5F2%5F0%26qid%3D1274841822%26sr%3D1-2-ent&amp;tag=perthkoala-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957">ELO</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=perthkoala-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> &#8211; It&#8217;s kind of easy to forget how huge ELO was at one point. Another theatrical/big production style band, ELO had a spacey sound and used UFO-looking space stations on their album covers. Their music was featured in the sci-fi (yeah, it counts) movie<em> Xanadu</em>, and did some sci-fi concept albums as well. Recently, their song <em>Mr. Blue Sky</em> was featured on an episode of <em>Doctor Who</em>.</p>
<p>Honorable mentions: Hawkwind, Front 242, Kraftwerk, TRex, New Order, Manufacture, NiN, Skinny Puppy, Orb, Nitzer Ebb, PWEI, Iron Maiden, Ultravox, UFO, Judas Priest, KLF, Psykosonik, Sepultura, King Crimson, Talking Heads, Radiohead, Duran Duran, Fear Factory, MC Frontalot, MBM, Shamen, Art of Noise, B-52s, Earth Wind &amp; Fire, Big Country, KMFDM, Black Sabbath, Blue Oyster Cult, Clash, Sisters of Mercy, Underworld, FSOL, Flock of Seagulls, Shriekback, Utopia, Rush, Police, Savatage, Who, Moody Blues, SSS, Rammstein, and a whole bunch of others. I have a ton more written down from when I was making this, but I&#8217;d love to hear your thoughts and additions too.</p>
<p>Wait? No David Bowie? No Kate Bush? Thomas Dolby? Bjork? Since this was bands, individual artists weren&#8217;t included, nor individual songs (Mars Needs Women, Planet Rock, Spice, Intergalactic, We Are Made of Stars, Rocket Man, More Human Than Human, etc.) &#8211; a top list of these may be coming soon, though&#8230;</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-417"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vombie.com/2010/05/26/the-top-10-sci-fi-bands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Return from Comic-Con</title>
		<link>http://vombie.com/2009/07/28/return-from-comic-con/</link>
		<comments>http://vombie.com/2009/07/28/return-from-comic-con/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vombie.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I figured I might as well jot down a few things/impressions from the event. Here are a few quick takes: Celebrities: lots of famous people are at this event, so it&#8217;s hard not to see someone that&#8217;s recognizable. Some that I saw: Seth Green, John Landis, Stan Lee, Scott Ian, Bruce Campbell, and a dozen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured I might as well jot down a few things/impressions from the event. Here are a few quick takes:<br />
Celebrities: lots of famous people are at this event, so it&#8217;s hard not to see someone that&#8217;s recognizable. Some that I saw: Seth Green, John Landis, Stan Lee, Scott Ian, Bruce Campbell, and a dozen or so &#8216;they look familiars&#8217; who I&#8217;ll probably figure out later.<br />
Events: Since most of the panels end up on YouTube, it does seem somewhat silly to go to anything that requires a multi-hour/day wait in line, even if it would have been great to have been in the same room as Terry Gilliam. I was in the same building, so I left it at that. Many of these events and panels really push the six degrees of separation as to what they even have to do with comics. And I agree wholeheartedly with the suggestions to enable people to obtain tickets/passes to the bigger panels and events versus forcing them to wait in line for ages. But I have a million ideas on ways they could improve the conference logistics, so I won&#8217;t bother with all of that.<br />
Booths: Biggest disappointment would be with the booths themselves. Some really got it right; they managed the flow of people and the items/information well, but way too many still don&#8217;t seem to get how to run a booth and/or market and promote themselves (or for that matter sell stuff) to the various types of people at this event. The worst was the BBCA booth, and yes, I&#8217;m saying that primarily because a) they dicked us around for three days on getting a bag instead of just doing the right thing and hooking their fans up, having a process in place, and/or not lying, b) they didn&#8217;t make it clear what items were exclusives until after they were sold out of them, and c) I&#8217;m still really pissed about the bag. It had David Tennant, er, Doctor Who on it after all. Some booths just had ridiculous lines the entire time, so if you wanted any sort of information (and not some sort of autograph or whatever) you were SOL. Does it not occur to these vendors/studios that some people are looking for information at this event and not just a free pen? For that matter, does it occur to them to try to reward their fans and their community versus enabling/helping the eBay opportunists that care more about grabbing stuff for profit? I&#8217;m cool with people making a buck, but it really sucks when a true blood fan (or, for that matter, a True Blood fan) doesn&#8217;t get rewarded for their loyalty and patronage in some way. Pass out the postcards to raise awareness; give some cool stuff to the people who are on your mailing lists, who have bought stuff from you, etc. Almost no one there was collecting information for later marketing, which is insane.<br />
Costumes: Some people see it as a costume party (or substitute for a day at the zoo) more than as an industry/professional event; I can see how that&#8217;d be fun, but someone should have a big &#8216;CostumeCon&#8217; given how many people love to dress up for an(y) occasion. For those asking what I wore, trust me, no one ever wants a picture of/with me so you&#8217;ll just have to make something up and imagine that I looked cool. Some of the costumes I &#8216;get,&#8217; but some yet again push the boundaries of &#8216;what does that have to do with comics?&#8217; It just seems to me that it&#8217;d make just as much sense to have a Coca-Cola booth in the middle of the exhibit hall as some of the stuff that is there, using the same logic of &#8216;well, comic book fans love sodas!&#8217; Hmm. Okay, admittedly, a Coca-Cola booth would be cool, but you get the point &#8211; relevance.<br />
Swag: As someone who&#8217;s been on the selecting, giving, and receiving end of swag at large/small industry events for [quite some time], I have to admit that the giveaways &#038; items were pretty mundane and overall quite a letdown &#8211; not to mention the convoluted, confusing process to get some of it. If you stood around at the LEGO booth, you could get a lanyard to play LEGO Rock Band. Then you got the lanyard punched after you played (and who wants the lanyard &#8216;ruined&#8217; with a hole punch?). Then you went to another booth to show them your punched lanyard to get a t-shirt &#8211; once you went back about four times to find someone who knew anything about the promotion. Somewhere in there you could ask for a pin too, randomly. Their lottery system was a bit better: rather than forcing you to be the first in line, you waited in line for a chance to get a ticket from a big box that might enable you (if you were lucky) to wait in line to buy the exclusive sets of the day. It might sound silly, but it was fair, and the line moved fast enough that you could normally get a few tries if needed before they ran out.<br />
One of the big issues with Comic-Con, though, is that it&#8217;s just too diverse; there are collectors, industry people (and various industries at that), wannabe industry people, studios, artists, general fans, etc. &#8211; but within those groups there are so many fractions it&#8217;s diluted past the point of usefulness to most any of them, especially when our &#8216;industry&#8217; badges just said &#8216;Professional&#8217; on them. I think it&#8217;d be much more beneficial to have the days/space/whatever divided (retro, sci-fi, action) &#8211; not to be exclusionary/secular but to focus it a little more and make it more manageable to find information and/or network. Sure, it&#8217;s a &#8216;fan&#8217; event at heart, but that term is so broad now that it&#8217;s meaningless, and it&#8217;s worthless to have an event try to be for &#8216;everyone.&#8217; I didn&#8217;t get to do any networking of my own stuff, but I might do that at one of the other smaller regional events later this year. (I&#8217;ll actually talk about the networking aspect of these shows in a later post.)<br />
I&#8217;ve been hearing that a lot of the smaller vendors/artists/studios/publishers might not be able to attend anymore because their sales were so dismal. Can&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m surprised; since all of the big studios have been promoting this event for all of the big-name actors and such attending, a lot of the attendees are there to see Actress X, not to support the comic community. I think this creates an opportunity for the regional events, and maybe more cross-promotion with events like PAX in September and so on, but it makes Comic-Con an obstacle course for those of us who are there for something other than watching Joss Whedon talk (as cool as that might be). But I&#8217;ll have more on all of this later&#8230;</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-217"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vombie.com/2009/07/28/return-from-comic-con/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Up Movie Review</title>
		<link>http://vombie.com/2009/06/07/up-movie-review/</link>
		<comments>http://vombie.com/2009/06/07/up-movie-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vombie.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s no big surprise that I&#8217;m a huge fan of Pixar movies; they&#8217;ve mastered the art of making movies with more humanity in them than most movies that actually contain humans, and their visual brilliance is second to none. But at some point you&#8217;ve got to figure that their magic will wear off; red tape [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s no big surprise that I&#8217;m a huge fan of Pixar movies; they&#8217;ve mastered the art of making movies with more humanity in them than most movies that actually contain humans, and their visual brilliance is second to none. But at some point you&#8217;ve got to figure that their magic will wear off; red tape and bureaucracy and executives will get in the way of their art &#038; they&#8217;ll start producing crap like some other not-to-be-named animation studios that manage to even make squirrels&#8211;and a hot redheaded squirrel&#8211;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhskSbh6EbA">look like crap</a>. That point thankfully hasn&#8217;t arrived yet; Up is an amazing movie with heart, humor, and beauty that keeps the Pixar tradition alive. (And looking at Pixar&#8217;s <a href="http://www.firstshowing.net/2008/04/09/disney-and-pixars-full-animated-line-up-through-2012/">upcoming roster</a>, it&#8217;s not likely to occur for some time.)<br />
One of the traditions of a Pixar movie is a short animation before the feature &#8211; this one is called Partly Cloudy. It manages to convey a beautiful story of acceptance, loyalty, and trust sans dialogue. It&#8217;s not really possible to go into detail about it sans spoilers (given that it is a short&#8230;), but I&#8217;ll write a synopsis of it later on.<br />
Up begins with the romance and between Carl and Ellie, who as children bonded over a common quest for adventure &#8211; wanting to embark on a journey to the land that time forgot, Paradise Falls; a land they had seen in newsreels featuring the dashing Charles Muntz, who was laughed at by the scientific community. We see their amazing love story as they grow old together; when they find out they can&#8217;t have children, they set their sites on fulfilling their childhood dreams of adventure, but life always seems to get in the way of making that adventure a reality. One of the things that Pixar manages to do so well is tell you the moral of the story without being heavy-handed or preachy; we get the message of how important it is to not let life pass you by, to appreciate the things you have, to share your journey with those you love, and to honor your promises throughout the movie. Carl is put into a difficult situation when his home becomes the center of a construction project, refusing to sell out. A snap loss of temper finally gives him nothing to lose, so he decides to embark on his journey once and for all by lifting his house up via balloons. What he didn&#8217;t bargain for was Russell, and over-eager scout who ends up along for the ride since he was under the porch when the house set sail.<br />
Up manages to be emotionally touching &#8211; humorous, heartfelt, and tear-worthy &#8211; while maintaining a sense of visual artistry that&#8217;s breathtaking yet not overpowering the story. The fact that the movie is driven by a compelling story and message effectively transports you to another world, one where the laws of physics don&#8217;t need to be accurate; anyone looking to nitpick the feasibility of the old man&#8217;s physical strength or the logistics of the plot is either deliberately missing the point in an attempt to avoid bawling their eyes out, or is just not capable of enjoying a tale that is greater than the sum of its details. It&#8217;s a sentimental tale that&#8217;s not overly syrupy; it manages to include some rather sad details with beautiful sensitivity and positivity.<br />
The applause at the end was well deserved. Bravo Pixar.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-121"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vombie.com/2009/06/07/up-movie-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek Review</title>
		<link>http://vombie.com/2009/05/11/star-trek-review/</link>
		<comments>http://vombie.com/2009/05/11/star-trek-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vombie.com/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of people have been asking me why I hated the new Star Trek movie so much; there&#8217;s some sort of mass hysteria created if there&#8217;s a hint of suggestion that this movie is not the best thing evah (at least until, say, Angels &#038; Demons or Terminator: Salvation, etc.) &#8211; and anyone who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people have been asking me why I hated the new Star Trek movie so much; there&#8217;s some sort of mass hysteria created if there&#8217;s a hint of suggestion that this movie is not the best thing evah (at least until, say, Angels &#038; Demons or Terminator: Salvation, etc.) &#8211; and anyone who doesn&#8217;t like this movie MUST be a &#8216;Trekkie.&#8217; Well, that kind of scares me. I&#8217;ve noticed that almost everyone that likes this movie has needed to make a disclaimer &#8211; &#8216;I don&#8217;t even like Star Trek!&#8217; &#8211; cos, you know, we wouldn&#8217;t want to think that they actually liked Star Trek (the horror). But the reasons I didn&#8217;t like the film have nothing to do with being a fan of Star Trek one way or the other; if this new direction had been pulled off well, I would have whole-heartedly embraced it, but it didn&#8217;t. Instead, it came across as a bad fanfic mash-up made by someone w/the budget to make it look really good.</p>
<p>The movie has some great visual moments; as far as pretty splosions go, there are some great scenes and moments of very cool action sequences (which I always enjoy). And Simon Pegg is brilliant as always. But other than that, the movie is really nothing but pretty. The plot is simplistic and contrived (forgivable; do we really need to ponder everything?), the women all wear miniskirts (which seven &#8211; seven! &#8211; men I&#8217;ve talked to about the film have noted immediately, with either annoyance or glee), and there aren&#8217;t many of those darn funny-looking aliens, just young, reasonably attractive human types. But the mantra of Star Trek &#8211; to &#8216;boldly go where no (man/one) has gone before&#8217; &#8211; was completely lacking; this film did nothing but meekly go where dozens of movies have gone before. Shallow enemy (who looked about as alien as a singer from a emo metal band)? Check. Planets blowing up/in? Check. Amazing series of coincidences that you&#8217;re supposed to roll with because they hurry the plot along? Check. There&#8217;s no actual suspense with ANYTHING in this movie; hell, all of the crew members except for Kirk start out fresh from academy in what will become their lifelong careers (no pesky senior officers to mentor them or ranks to climb, phew!). And don&#8217;t worry about not being able to follow the plot; every character, every plot device, every action, is dumbed down and described in detail as if it were a training exercise (tell them what you&#8217;re going to do, explain it while doing it, then tell them what you just did). The film has the subtlety of a shotgun blasting up your nasal cavity. It also made sure it pandered to the people who weren&#8217;t really fans of the franchise but who&#8217;d know all of the character&#8217;s &#8216;punchlines&#8217; &#8211; I guess it was supposed to be clever or an homage to put in every single clichÃ©d quote imaginable. And while some made it feel more like a Trek movie, most seemed forced; like the only humor the film could have had to be derived from injecting it with some camp from the &#8216;old&#8217; Trek &#8211; there was no original humor, but there was one character bordering very dangerously on the lines of a Jar Jar Ewok. If he&#8217;d started to talk like Short Round, I&#8217;d be convinced this movie was a plot against humanity. </p>
<p>Star Trek has always had a bit of social commentary within in (many times to the point of preachiness), but this film has nothing of the sort. If anything, it regresses to being a pure-dude action movie; there are very few women in the movie; most are background decoration, and even Uhura has been demoted to being nothing more than a doting Spock fangirl who lets Kirk take credit for her research. There are barely any aliens in the movie, and no moral lessons or value judgments need to be made. In that sense, it is all supposed to be about the relationships forming between the crew, but the movie doesn&#8217;t even allow that to happen with any nuance or cleverness; every interaction is so forced and everyone is immediately best buds or adversaries. And while the basic premise (time has changed so everything is different) would have allowed them to do pretty much anything they wanted, they didn&#8217;t take any real chances or risks (Sulu could have been a chick. There could have been more aliens. They had free reign and did nothing with it other than using it as a crutch for when they slightly altered the canon!). It starts to feel a bit like Fast and Furious in Space (which, incidentally, would ROCK! &#8211; patent pending <img src='http://vombie.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ), but with some Star Trek stuff thrown in so it could be called Star Trek. So if they&#8217;d called it what it was &#8211; &#8216;fun, mindless fluff&#8217; &#8211; I would have loved it at that level, but trying to make it fun, mindless fluff AND Star Trek was too much for one movie (or, really, simply not enough). </p>
<div class="shr-publisher-111"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vombie.com/2009/05/11/star-trek-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watchmen Movie Review</title>
		<link>http://vombie.com/2009/03/05/watchmen-movie-review/</link>
		<comments>http://vombie.com/2009/03/05/watchmen-movie-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vombie.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watchmen is not a story for everyone. Unlike the traditional comic archetypes of a &#8216;hero,&#8217; the characters are unlikeable; they aren&#8217;t empathetic or relatable on more than a superficial level, which is of course the idea &#8211; likewise, they can&#8217;t relate well to people, events, relationships &#8211; or, in the case of Dr. Manhattan, time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watchmen is not a story for everyone. Unlike the traditional comic archetypes of a &#8216;hero,&#8217; the characters are unlikeable; they aren&#8217;t empathetic or relatable on more than a superficial level, which is of course the idea &#8211; likewise, they can&#8217;t relate well to people, events, relationships &#8211; or, in the case of Dr. Manhattan, time or humanity. The story is filled with rape, sex, intense violence, and other elements that make this story very distinct from your run-of-the-mill comic book movie. But this isn&#8217;t a comic book movie &#8211; it&#8217;s from a graphic novel (with emphasis on the graphic), and these are costumed characters (save Dr. M) &#8211; NOT heroes. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not familiar with the story, you probably don&#8217;t want to see this film. It&#8217;s not a &#8216;sex/drugs/rock-n-roll&#8217; story, although certain characters (most notably Rorschach) are similar to the vigilante anti-hero that style of story glorifies. The concept that we should not expect anyone, no matter how much spandex and gadgetry they may have, to determine our fate is a compelling one. We have always been conditioned to entrust ourselves to these types of characters because they are not human or are in some way supposed to be &#8216;better&#8217; than us; why do we not trust human nature enough to create our own destinies, to have more faith in ourselves? Would we sit around and let the world die if a hero wasn&#8217;t around to save us from ourselves? After all: who watches the Watchmen? </p>
<p>If you are familiar with the story, then you will probably be amazed at how true to the original it is, but some of the changes left me a bit baffled. For instance, why did they change the watch that sets into motion the accident that transforms Dr. Manhattan? But overall the changes are few and slight, and it seems that they even made an accompanying Tales of the Black Freighter to be released on DVD (that story is not at all in the movie). The visual elements were well done overall; Rorschach looked amazingly true to the novel (even without the mask), and many of the small details will make it worth watching this film again (hint: look for all of the 80s &#8216;celebrities&#8217; you can find!).</p>
<p>Overall, your enjoyment of the film will mostly hinge on your enjoyment of the graphic novel. If you haven&#8217;t read it, you probably will want to prior to seeing the film &#8211; not because you won&#8217;t be able to follow it otherwise, but because your expectations of a standard-fare superhero movie need to be altered beforehand. If you know what&#8217;s in store for you, this movie will pleasantly surprise you. If you just want to see boobs and explosions (and a glowing blue digital penis), it does have those elements, but the premise of the film and the lofty, existential concepts behind it will disappoint you. </p>
<div class="shr-publisher-106"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vombie.com/2009/03/05/watchmen-movie-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

